Civic Literacy Practice Test

The pairing of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission with the First Amendment is accurate because the case fundamentally revolves around issues of free speech and political campaign spending. In this landmark decision from 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that restrictions on independent expenditures for political communications by corporations and unions violate the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech. The ruling established that the government cannot limit the amount of money spent by these entities in support of candidates for election, reinforcing the notion that political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment. In contrast, the other cases do not directly engage with the amendments to which they were paired. Marbury v. Madison specifically addresses issues related to judicial review, but it does not involve the Tenth Amendment. Roe v. Wade addresses the right to privacy in relation to women's reproductive rights but is linked to the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments rather than the Third. Lastly, Mapp v. Ohio deals with the exclusionary rule and unreasonable searches and seizures, which correlates with the Fourth Amendment rather than the Fifth.